It seems like you are referring to the events surrounding the assassination of President John F. Kennedy in 1963. The assassination and the subsequent medical examination of President Kennedy's injuries have been subjects of extensive investigation, debate, and conspiracy theories over the years. Let me provide some context and clarity on the matter.
On November 22, 1963, President Kennedy was shot while riding in a motorcade in Dallas, Texas. He was rushed to Parkland Hospital, where he was pronounced dead.
During the initial examination at Parkland Hospital, some medical staff, including doctors and nurses, made various observations about the nature of President Kennedy's injuries. These accounts have been documented in historical records and reports.
According to the official autopsy report conducted later that day at the Bethesda Naval Hospital, it was concluded that President Kennedy suffered two gunshot wounds:
The first gunshot wound struck the upper back of President Kennedy and exited from the front of his throat. This wound was non-fatal.
The second gunshot wound struck the back of President Kennedy's head, causing severe and fatal damage. The official report described the wound as a large defect in the right rear of the skull, with brain tissue extruding.
The discrepancy you mentioned about the location of the exit wound (right rear of the head) compared to the entrance wound (back of the head) can be attributed to the complex dynamics of high-velocity gunshot wounds and the confusion that can arise in high-stress situations like an emergency trauma situation. The initial medical staff at Parkland Hospital faced a chaotic and emotionally charged environment, and their observations might not have been as precise as the detailed autopsy conducted later at Bethesda Naval Hospital.
The official autopsy report and subsequent investigations have largely supported the conclusion that President Kennedy was shot from behind by a lone gunman, Lee Harvey Oswald, firing from the Texas School Book Depository. However, there have been numerous conspiracy theories and alternative accounts put forth over the years, which have fueled continued debate and speculation.
It's important to remember that the investigation and discussions around historical events can be complex and contentious. As such, many of the details have been extensively scrutinized and analyzed, leading to varying interpretations and perspectives. If you are interested in this topic, I would encourage you to research reputable sources and historical records to gain a comprehensive understanding of the events surrounding the assassination of President Kennedy.