The question of whether J. Robert Oppenheimer was a "good" person is a complex and subjective matter. Oppenheimer was a brilliant physicist who played a crucial role in the development of the atomic bomb during World War II as the scientific director of the Manhattan Project. His contributions to the project helped the United States build the first atomic weapons, which ultimately led to the end of the war with Japan.
However, after the war, Oppenheimer faced controversy and scrutiny due to his involvement with left-wing political organizations and associations with individuals who were suspected of having communist ties during the McCarthy era in the United States. These circumstances led to a security clearance hearing in 1954, during which he was accused of being a security risk. As a result, his security clearance was revoked, effectively ending his direct involvement in government scientific work.
Opinions about Oppenheimer's character are divided. Some argue that he was a patriot who acted responsibly to ensure the safety and success of the United States during wartime, while others believe that he regretted his contributions to the development of the atomic bomb and later sought to promote international cooperation and disarmament.
It's important to remember that individuals, like Oppenheimer, can be complex and exhibit both positive and negative traits. His contributions to science and the development of the atomic bomb were significant, but his involvement in political affairs and the subsequent fallout raise ethical and moral questions.
Ultimately, whether one views Oppenheimer as a "good" person or not will depend on their perspective, values, and interpretation of his actions and choices throughout his life.