there is no scientific evidence to support the notion that people can see specific future moments in a reliable and consistent manner. The ability to see the future, often referred to as precognition or clairvoyance, is a topic that has been explored and debated for centuries, but it remains a controversial and unproven concept.
While some individuals claim to have experienced premonitions or visions of future events, these anecdotes are often difficult to validate and could be attributed to coincidence, selective memory, or other psychological phenomena. Scientific investigations into precognition have generally produced inconclusive results, and claims of psychic abilities have not withstood rigorous scientific testing.
The majority of mainstream scientists and researchers assert that the laws of physics, as we currently understand them, do not allow for the ability to see specific future moments. Our understanding of time and causality suggests that events unfold in a linear manner, and our ability to predict future events is limited to probabilistic assessments based on past observations and patterns.
As with any extraordinary claim, if someone were to make a convincing case for precognition or similar abilities, it would require robust and replicable evidence from controlled scientific experiments to gain broader acceptance within the scientific community.
It's essential to approach such topics with a critical and skeptical mindset while staying open to new evidence and discoveries in the future. For now, the idea that people can see specific future moments remains speculative and unsupported by scientific consensus.