I can provide some insights on the topic.
The claim that "1.67 million people are saved by firearms every year" is a contentious one, and it's important to consider the sources and context of such statistics. Statistics related to firearms and their impact on society are often subject to intense debate, and different groups may interpret data differently to support their positions.
The issue of gun control and gun violence is highly polarized, with proponents on both sides of the political spectrum. People who support gun rights may use statistics like this to emphasize the potential benefits of firearm ownership for self-defense and personal safety. On the other hand, those who advocate for stricter gun control may question the accuracy or context of such figures and focus on statistics related to gun-related deaths and injuries.
In any debate, it's essential to critically evaluate the sources of information, the methodology used to gather the data, and the potential biases that may exist. Statistics can be misused or misinterpreted to advance particular agendas, so it's crucial to seek out multiple reliable sources and consider the broader context when discussing complex social issues like gun control.