I can provide an objective analysis of the situation.
Firstly, it's important to note that interpreting survey results requires careful consideration of various factors. The claim that 37% of atheists became so to indulge in vices without guilt is a strong statement that may warrant further investigation. Here are some points to consider:
Survey reliability: Assess the reliability and credibility of the survey itself. Look into the sample size, the methodology used, the population surveyed, and whether the questions were unbiased.
Causation vs. correlation: The survey may show a correlation between atheism and the desire to engage in vices without guilt, but it doesn't necessarily prove causation. Other factors could be at play, such as cultural or societal influences.
Diversity among atheists: Atheists, like any other group, are diverse in their beliefs and reasons for identifying as atheists. Generalizing based on a survey result could be misleading and unfair to the majority who may have different reasons for their beliefs.
Personal motivations: People's beliefs are shaped by a wide range of factors, including personal experiences, education, philosophical exploration, and more. Reducing atheism to a desire for indulging in vices oversimplifies a complex topic.
Stigmatization and stereotypes: Making assumptions about a group based on a small subset can lead to stereotypes and stigmatization. It's essential to avoid such generalizations.
If this survey were to be taken seriously, it would require further research and a deeper understanding of the motivations and beliefs of individuals who identify as atheists. It's important to approach such topics with open-mindedness and empathy, recognizing that people's beliefs are multifaceted and deeply personal.