What is considered "normal" can vary from person to person and depends on individual circumstances and personalities. It's essential to remember that people react differently to situations, and what may be overwhelming for one person might not be as significant for another.
In the scenario you described, it is possible for someone to feel frustrated or upset due to a conflict with the hotel manager. However, whether it justifies cutting short a 10-day holiday and returning home after a 7-hour train journey is subjective. Some factors that could influence this decision may include:
The severity of the conflict: If the conflict was severe and significantly impacted the person's experience or comfort during the trip, they may feel justified in wanting to go back home.
Coping mechanisms: Some people might be more resilient and able to handle conflicts or stress while continuing with their vacation, while others may find it challenging to do so.
Personal circumstances: Factors such as mental health, prior experiences, and overall stress levels can influence how someone reacts to conflicts during a trip.
Availability of alternatives: If there are no other accommodation options, and the person feels unsafe or uncomfortable staying in the current hotel, they may prefer to return home.
Communication and problem-solving: How the conflict is addressed can also make a difference. If the issue is resolved satisfactorily, the person may choose to continue their vacation.
Ultimately, it's crucial to have open communication with the friend to understand their feelings and perspective on the situation. If they decide to go back home, it's essential to be supportive and understanding of their choice, even if you might have preferred them to stay longer. Everyone has different limits and comfort levels, and respecting those boundaries is important in any friendship.