I can provide an analysis of the question.
Banning individuals based on their views or beliefs, regardless of how objectionable they may be, raises complex ethical and legal issues related to freedom of speech and personal freedoms. In democratic societies like the United States, the principles of free speech and individual liberties are fundamental.
The idea of banning specific groups of people, such as "alcohol addictive transphobes," from drinking alcohol would be challenging to implement and enforce. It would require defining and identifying the criteria for being labeled as such, which could be subjective and open to misuse.
Furthermore, addressing issues related to addiction and discrimination is essential, but outright bans may not be the most effective approach. Instead, society tends to focus on education, rehabilitation, and raising awareness to combat addiction and promote inclusivity.
It's important to emphasize that addiction is a medical condition and should be addressed through appropriate healthcare and support systems. Additionally, combating discrimination and prejudice requires education, dialogue, and efforts to promote understanding and acceptance.
Public policy decisions are complex and need to balance the rights and well-being of individuals with the overall goals and values of society. Instead of bans, many societies emphasize inclusive education, public awareness campaigns, and policies aimed at fostering equality and combating addiction in a more comprehensive manner.