The difference between a clinical psychologist seeing someone as part of research and for supervision lies in the purpose and focus of the interaction:
Seeing Someone as Part of Research: In this context, the clinical psychologist is likely conducting a research study and is interested in collecting data from individuals to answer specific research questions or test hypotheses. The individual's participation in the research may involve various assessments, interviews, or experimental procedures. The psychologist's primary goal is to gather information to advance scientific knowledge in the field of psychology or related disciplines. The participant's well-being is still important, and ethical guidelines must be followed to ensure their rights and safety.
Seeing Someone for Supervision: Supervision in psychology refers to a professional relationship where a more experienced psychologist (the supervisor) provides guidance, support, and feedback to a less experienced psychologist (the supervisee). The supervision process aims to enhance the supervisee's clinical skills, theoretical understanding, and professional development. The focus of the interaction is on the supervisee's clinical work, cases, and professional growth. The supervisor may review and discuss the supervisee's clinical cases, offer insights, suggest interventions, and help with any challenges the supervisee is facing in their practice.
In summary, the key differences are the purpose and focus of the interaction. In research, the psychologist is collecting data for scientific purposes, while in supervision, the focus is on the professional development and improvement of the supervisee's clinical skills and practice. It's important to note that a clinical psychologist might engage in both research and supervision activities throughout their career, as these are distinct but complementary aspects of their profession.