The language used to describe these conditions has evolved over time, and different individuals and communities may have varying preferences. Some people prefer person-first language (e.g., "person with autism" or "person with ADHD") to emphasize that the condition is just one aspect of their identity, while others prefer identity-first language (e.g., "autistic person" or "ADHD individual") to highlight that the condition is an integral part of who they are.
Both approaches have valid reasons and advocates. Person-first language aims to avoid reducing a person to their diagnosis and emphasizes their humanity and individuality beyond the condition. On the other hand, identity-first language recognizes that neurodevelopmental conditions significantly shape an individual's experiences and perspectives and can be an essential part of their identity and self-understanding.
It's essential to respect and use the language that individuals with these conditions prefer for themselves. When discussing these matters with others, you can ask them how they would like to be referred to or observe the language they use to describe themselves.
Some organizations and advocates suggest using "identity-first" language when talking about autism and "person-first" language when talking about ADHD. For instance, saying "autistic person" and "person with ADHD" respectively. However, it's essential to remember that not everyone will have the same preference, so always listen to the individual's choice regarding the language they prefer.
Ultimately, the goal should be to use language that is respectful, inclusive, and acknowledges the unique experiences and perspectives of each individual. It's also essential to be open to learning and adapting as language preferences evolve and are better understood within the communities affected by these conditions.