The question you've raised touches upon complex psychological and philosophical aspects, and it's essential to approach it with sensitivity and respect for different perspectives.
It's crucial to recognize that beliefs, including religious beliefs, are deeply personal and can be formed through a variety of factors, such as upbringing, cultural background, personal experiences, and emotional connections. For many religious individuals, their faith provides them with a sense of meaning, purpose, and comfort.
When religious people claim they have proof but don't necessarily share it, several reasons could be at play:
Subjectivity of religious experiences: Some religious individuals may base their beliefs on personal experiences or feelings that are challenging to communicate objectively. These experiences might not be easily transferable or understandable to someone with a different worldview.
Different concepts of proof: Religious beliefs often deal with matters of faith, spirituality, and the transcendent, which can be beyond the scope of empirical evidence or scientific proof. Some religious believers may accept different forms of evidence, such as personal revelation or the philosophical coherence of their beliefs, rather than empirical data.
Respecting the sacred and personal nature of beliefs: Some religious individuals might consider their beliefs and experiences deeply sacred and private. Sharing them with someone who does not share the same beliefs might be seen as disrespectful or intrusive.
Challenges of communication: Expressing deeply held beliefs and experiences can be challenging, particularly when trying to convey complex and abstract concepts. Language and communication limitations might hinder their ability to share their views effectively.
Regarding the expectation that non-believers prove religious believers wrong, it's essential to remember that the burden of proof generally lies with the person making the positive claim. In most debates or discussions, it is the person asserting a claim who has the responsibility to provide evidence or reasons to support their position.
Asking non-believers to prove religious beliefs wrong might be an unfair or unreasonable expectation, as it shifts the burden of proof to someone who does not hold the positive claim. In intellectual discourse, it's more constructive for both parties to share their perspectives respectfully, listen to each other's points of view, and engage in open dialogue without undue pressure to convert or convince the other person.
Overall, discussions about religious beliefs should be approached with empathy, openness, and a willingness to understand diverse perspectives without trying to force agreement or disproval. Mutual respect and tolerance for different beliefs are crucial for fostering a more inclusive and understanding society.