+60 votes
in Psychotherapy by (4.4k points)
edited by

Your answer

Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
+9 votes
by (6.4k points)

However, in the context of therapy, it is generally not considered appropriate for a therapist to cancel a session with one client because another client is experiencing a crisis. Therapists have a responsibility to maintain professional boundaries and prioritize the well-being of each individual client.

If a therapist is faced with a situation where multiple clients need immediate attention, they should strive to manage their schedule and responsibilities in a way that ensures all clients receive appropriate care. This may involve referring a client in crisis to appropriate resources or providing support outside of regular session hours.

Therapists are trained to handle challenging situations and emergencies while maintaining ethical standards. If a therapist believes that a client is at serious risk or in need of urgent assistance, they should follow established protocols, such as contacting emergency services or involving appropriate mental health professionals.

Overall, therapists are committed to providing the best care possible for their clients, and their decisions are guided by professional ethics, client safety, and maintaining the integrity of the therapeutic relationship. Canceling a session with one client to prioritize another would not be a common or appropriate practice.

Welcome to Mindwellnessforum where you can ask questions about reationships and mental health
...