In Carl Jung's quote, "Neurosis is always a substitute for legitimate suffering," the term "legitimate" is used to imply that there are certain types of suffering that are natural and necessary parts of the human experience. Jung believed that some level of suffering is an inherent aspect of life and personal growth. This suffering can result from various life events, challenges, or even existential questions and dilemmas.
When Jung refers to "legitimate suffering," he suggests that this type of suffering serves a purpose and is part of the natural process of individuation, which is the psychological journey towards self-realization and becoming a whole, integrated individual. In this context, legitimate suffering could include dealing with loss, facing life's difficulties, coming to terms with personal limitations, or exploring one's emotions and unconscious aspects.
On the other hand, Jung contrasts legitimate suffering with neurosis. Neurosis, in this context, refers to a psychological disorder where an individual's coping mechanisms become dysfunctional, leading to emotional, mental, and behavioral disturbances. These disturbances arise as a way to avoid or escape from the legitimate suffering that should be acknowledged and faced.
In essence, Jung's quote suggests that avoiding or repressing legitimate suffering may lead to the development of neurosis as a defense mechanism. Instead of facing and processing the natural challenges and pains of life, a person may develop maladaptive patterns of behavior or coping strategies, which can exacerbate their psychological issues.
Understanding and embracing legitimate suffering as a part of life's journey can be an essential step in personal growth, self-awareness, and psychological well-being, according to Jung's perspective.