It's important to recognize that public opinions and attitudes can change over time for various reasons, and there might not be a single factor responsible for shifts in perceptions about individuals like Princess Diana and Camilla Parker Bowles.
Princess Diana was undoubtedly a beloved figure during her lifetime. Her charisma, humanitarian work, and personal struggles resonated with many people around the world. However, public opinions about historical figures can become more nuanced and complex as time passes. After her tragic death in 1997, Diana's legacy and personal life have been subject to ongoing analysis and discussion.
Camilla Parker Bowles, now known as the Duchess of Cornwall, was involved in a highly publicized extramarital relationship with Prince Charles while he was still married to Princess Diana. This situation created controversy and public scrutiny, with some people holding unfavorable opinions about her involvement in the royal family's affairs at the time.
As for Rupert Murdoch, he is a media mogul who owns various news outlets and publications. While media outlets can have significant influence in shaping public discourse and perceptions, it is essential to remember that individuals' opinions and beliefs are shaped by a multitude of factors, including personal experiences, cultural norms, and exposure to diverse sources of information.
It would be overly simplistic to attribute shifts in public perceptions solely to the influence of one person or media entity. Public opinions are often the result of a complex interplay of various factors, and people's attitudes towards public figures can evolve over time due to new information, changing societal norms, and evolving cultural contexts.