Both a man with nothing to lose and a man with everything to lose can potentially be dangerous, but the nature of their danger may differ.
A man with nothing to lose: When someone has nothing to lose, they may feel they have little or no stake in society or their personal well-being. This lack of attachment to life or possessions can make them unpredictable and impulsive. They might engage in reckless and risky behaviors, including criminal acts, as they have little concern for the consequences. Such individuals may feel they have little to lose in terms of reputation, relationships, or freedom, making them more willing to take extreme actions.
A man with everything to lose: On the other hand, a man with everything to lose may be dangerous in a different way. They have a lot at stake, such as their reputation, wealth, social status, family, and possibly their freedom. Fear of losing these valuable assets might lead them to take drastic measures to protect what they have. This fear of losing everything they've worked for could push them to act in self-preservation, which may include unethical or even illegal actions.
Ultimately, determining which individual is more dangerous depends on the specific circumstances and the actions they might take in a given situation. The potential for danger lies in the individual's mindset, their values, their mental state, and the specific factors influencing their decisions at that particular moment. It's crucial to recognize that dangerous behavior can manifest in different ways and should be assessed on a case-by-case basis rather than categorically comparing individuals based on what they have to lose or not.