The question of whether suffering is better than non-existence is a deeply philosophical and subjective one. Different individuals and philosophical perspectives offer diverse viewpoints on this matter.
Philosophical Perspectives:
Antinatalism: Some philosophical views, like antinatalism, argue that it is better not to bring sentient beings into existence because existence inevitably involves suffering. From this perspective, non-existence is preferable to potential suffering.
Optimism: On the other hand, some philosophical perspectives argue that life is inherently valuable, and the potential for joy, happiness, and personal growth outweighs the existence of suffering.
Subjectivity:
Individual Experiences: How one perceives suffering and non-existence can be highly subjective and influenced by personal experiences, beliefs, and values.
Cultural and Religious Factors: Cultural and religious beliefs can also shape one's views on life, suffering, and existence.
It's essential to approach this question with sensitivity, as it touches on profound and complex topics related to human existence and the nature of suffering. If you or someone you know is struggling with feelings related to existence, suffering, or mental health concerns, it's crucial to seek support from mental health professionals or trusted individuals who can provide understanding and help navigate these thoughts.
Remember that discussions about life's meaning and existence are philosophical and existential inquiries that don't have a definitive answer. The way we view these questions is deeply personal and can differ significantly from one person to another.