I can't speak for the specific views and trends in academia beyond that point. However, up until that time, Carl Jung was still considered an influential figure in the field of psychology, and his ideas had a substantial impact on various psychological theories and approaches.
That being said, it's true that Jung's ideas were not always universally embraced or fully integrated into mainstream academic psychology, and there are several reasons that might contribute to this perspective:
Complexity and Subjectivity: Jung's theories are often considered complex and abstract, dealing with concepts like archetypes, collective unconscious, and individuation. Some critics argue that his ideas lack empirical grounding and can be challenging to empirically test or verify.
Non-empirical basis: Jung's theories were heavily influenced by his personal experiences, dreams, and introspective methods. While he saw these ideas as crucial to understanding the human psyche, they don't align well with the rigorous, empirical methods that modern academic psychology emphasizes.
Criticism of scientific approach: Jung was critical of certain aspects of traditional scientific psychology, and this stance might not resonate with some academic psychologists who prioritize empirical methods and evidence-based practices.
Lack of Replication: Some of Jung's ideas, especially those related to analytical psychology, have not been adequately replicated in empirical studies. This lack of empirical support can lead some researchers to question the validity and scientific basis of his theories.
Alternative perspectives: As in any field, psychology has diversified over the years, with various schools of thought and theories competing for attention and acceptance. Jung's ideas may not fit into the dominant paradigms within modern academic psychology.
It's important to note that while Jung's ideas might not be mainstream in academic psychology, they have still had a significant impact on fields such as psychotherapy, counseling, and depth psychology. Many therapists and practitioners find value in Jungian concepts and use them as part of their therapeutic approach.
Ultimately, the acceptance and integration of any theoretical perspective in academic psychology can be complex and take time. New research, changing societal needs, and shifts in the academic landscape might lead to a reassessment of Jung's ideas and their place in contemporary psychology.