The terminology "unhoused" is often considered more respectful and person-centered compared to "homeless." The preference for using "unhoused" stems from a desire to shift the focus from the condition of lacking a home to the idea that housing is a basic human right, and people experiencing homelessness should not be defined solely by their current living situation.
Here are some reasons why some people and advocates prefer using "unhoused" over "homeless":
Dignity and Empathy: "Unhoused" emphasizes the humanity of individuals and acknowledges that they are people first, who happen to lack stable housing.
Reducing Stigma: "Homeless" has been associated with negative stereotypes and assumptions. Using "unhoused" helps reduce the stigma associated with homelessness, which can be a barrier to accessing support and resources.
Person-Centered Language: By using "unhoused," the focus is shifted from the condition to the person's current situation. This person-first language encourages empathy and understanding.
Challenging the System: Some advocates argue that using "homeless" implies that it is a personal failing rather than a result of systemic issues like housing affordability, mental health, and social services. "Unhoused" places more responsibility on society to address the problem.
Encouraging Action: The language we use can influence attitudes and behaviors. By using "unhoused," there's an implication that society needs to work towards providing housing solutions rather than just accepting the state of homelessness.
It's important to note that language preferences can vary among individuals and communities, so it's essential to listen and be open to feedback when discussing sensitive topics like homelessness. The goal should always be to treat people experiencing homelessness with respect, dignity, and understanding, regardless of the terminology used.