It is essential to recognize that not all skeptics of astrology base their critiques solely on a lack of "meaningfully lived human experience." While some skeptics may not have personally explored astrology in-depth, their critiques often stem from different perspectives and reasons:
Lack of Empirical Evidence: Many skeptics approach astrology from a scientific standpoint, arguing that there is no empirical evidence to support the claims made by astrologers. They may question the validity of astrological predictions and the accuracy of astrological personality descriptions, as these claims often lack rigorous scientific testing and verification.
Logical Fallacies: Skeptics often point out logical fallacies present in astrological arguments. These fallacies may include generalizations, confirmation bias, post hoc reasoning (assuming causation from correlation), and the Barnum effect (using vague statements that could apply to anyone).
Cultural and Historical Context: Critics might also examine astrology from a cultural and historical perspective. They may argue that astrology's popularity and perceived accuracy in some cultures are influenced by cultural norms, traditions, and psychological factors rather than any inherent truth.
Alternative Explanations: Skeptics might offer alternative explanations for why people believe in astrology and find personal meaning in their astrological charts. These explanations can include the Forer effect (people accepting vague or general statements as personally accurate) and the placebo effect (people experiencing positive effects due to belief rather than the specific content of astrology).
Unfalsifiability: Some skeptics raise concerns about the unfalsifiability of astrology. When astrological predictions fail to come true, some proponents may attribute this to incorrect birth times, the influence of other astrological factors, or the complexities of astrology, making it difficult to objectively test its claims.
It's important to note that not all skeptics approach astrology with closed minds, and their critiques may be motivated by a desire for critical thinking, evidence-based reasoning, and a deeper understanding of human psychology and belief systems. However, as with any subject, there will be a range of opinions and attitudes among skeptics, each with their unique reasons for skepticism.