+92 votes
in Philosophy of Everyday Life by (6.4k points)
edited by

Your answer

Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
+49 votes
by (5.5k points)

The belief that a god or some higher power is necessary to be good but not to be bad is rooted in certain religious and philosophical perspectives. This idea is often associated with the concept of moral absolutism, which posits that there are objective and universal moral truths that apply to all people and situations. People who hold this belief may argue the following points to support their view:

  1. Divine Command Theory: Some religious believers adhere to the notion that morality is determined by the commands or will of a higher power, such as a god. They believe that goodness is defined by what God commands, and to be good, one must follow these divine commands. Conversely, they may argue that evil or immorality arises from violating these divine commands.

  2. Fear of Punishment and Desire for Reward: For some, the belief in a god who rewards good behavior and punishes bad behavior in the afterlife serves as a motivation to be good. They might think that without this external reward-punishment system, some individuals would lack the incentive to act morally.

  3. Objective Moral Standard: The belief in a god can also be linked to the idea that without a higher power, there would be no objective moral standard. Some people think that without a divine authority, moral values become subjective and relative, leading to a breakdown in societal order and cohesion.

  4. Religious Indoctrination: In societies where religious teachings play a significant role, people are often raised with the notion that moral principles are derived from their religious texts or teachings. As a result, they may associate goodness with religious beliefs and the guidance of a god.

On the other hand, some people might see the potential for individuals to act immorally or harm others without the need for a god. Some arguments that could support this perspective include:

  1. Human Nature and Empathy: Some individuals believe that humans possess an inherent sense of empathy and compassion that drives them to act ethically and care for others, regardless of religious beliefs.

  2. Ethical Philosophies: Secular ethical philosophies, such as utilitarianism, deontology, and virtue ethics, provide frameworks for moral behavior without invoking a higher power. These philosophical systems propose that morality can be reasoned about and understood through human rationality and empathy.

  3. Atheistic Morality: Atheists and agnostics can still lead moral lives guided by their own ethical principles and social norms, emphasizing the value of human well-being, cooperation, and societal harmony.

  4. Religious Hypocrisy: Some critics argue that, in practice, the belief in a god does not prevent some individuals from committing immoral acts. They point to instances of religious leaders or followers acting hypocritically or using their beliefs to justify harmful behavior.

It's important to note that beliefs about the connection between morality and religion can be diverse and complex, and individuals' views may vary greatly based on cultural, social, and personal factors. People's understanding of morality is influenced by a combination of religious upbringing, philosophical outlook, cultural norms, and personal experiences.

Welcome to Mindwellnessforum where you can ask questions about reationships and mental health
...