+12 votes
in Philosophy of Everyday Life by (6.3k points)
edited by

Your answer

Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
+8 votes
by (4.3k points)

Surrendering to God and having free will are two concepts often discussed in the context of religious and philosophical discussions. While they may seem contradictory at first glance, they can coexist and complement each other in various belief systems. Here's an overview of their differences:

  1. Free Will: Free will refers to the belief that individuals have the ability to make choices and decisions independently, without external coercion or predestination. It implies that humans have the power to exercise their own judgment, reason, and agency when faced with different situations and moral dilemmas. This concept is prominent in many religious traditions and philosophical schools of thought.

In the context of free will, individuals are responsible for their actions and choices, and they may face the consequences of those choices. This notion is often associated with personal accountability and the idea that individuals have the capacity to shape their lives and destinies.

  1. Surrendering to God: Surrendering to God is a concept found in various religious beliefs, particularly in monotheistic traditions like Christianity, Islam, and Hinduism. It involves submitting oneself to the will of a higher power or God, acknowledging that there is a divine plan or purpose beyond individual understanding.

By surrendering to God, individuals trust in the divine wisdom and accept that God's knowledge and guidance surpass their own. It's an act of humility and devotion, acknowledging that God's will is ultimately for the greater good and that humans may not always fully comprehend the reasons behind certain events or circumstances.

Differences and Complementarity:

The apparent tension between surrendering to God and having free will arises from the idea that if God is all-knowing and all-powerful, then everything is predestined, and individual choices may be an illusion. However, different belief systems navigate this tension in various ways:

a) Compatibilism: Some philosophical perspectives propose that free will and determinism (the idea that everything is predetermined) are not mutually exclusive. They argue that even if the universe operates according to a predetermined plan or God's will, individuals can still possess free will in their decision-making within that framework.

b) Divine Plan and Human Agency: Many religious believers reconcile surrendering to God and free will by accepting the concept of a divine plan while acknowledging that humans have the ability to make choices within that plan. In this view, God's wisdom and knowledge guide the course of events, but individuals are still accountable for their actions.

c) Mystery and Faith: For some, the interplay between surrendering to God and free will remains a mystery, beyond complete human comprehension. They might see it as an article of faith, accepting both aspects without attempting to fully rationalize the apparent paradox.

Ultimately, how individuals interpret and balance the concepts of surrendering to God and free will can depend on their specific religious beliefs, philosophical outlooks, and cultural backgrounds. Different belief systems

Welcome to Mindwellnessforum where you can ask questions about reationships and mental health
...