throughout history, there have been instances where governments, for various reasons, have chosen not to disclose certain information to the public, and fear of causing panic is one possible motivation.
Governments may withhold information if they believe that releasing it could lead to widespread fear, confusion, or unrest. This is especially true during times of crisis, national security threats, or natural disasters. Sometimes, authorities might delay the release of sensitive information until they can gather more comprehensive data or formulate a well-informed response.
While the intention to prevent panic may be a factor in keeping certain information confidential, other reasons might include national security concerns, protection of ongoing investigations, diplomatic relations, or protecting classified technologies.
However, it's essential to strike a balance between transparency and responsible information dissemination. Transparency helps build trust between governments and their citizens, and in many cases, being open about challenges and potential risks can lead to better public cooperation and preparedness.
It is worth noting that in democratic societies, there is often a level of accountability and checks and balances in place to ensure that information is not unnecessarily withheld, and public interest is considered. Nevertheless, the balance between national security and transparency can be complex and may vary based on specific circumstances and cultural norms.
If you have concerns about the transparency of your government or the handling of certain information, it is crucial to engage in open dialogue and support institutions that promote transparency and accountability.