The solution that would be better for problems depends on the nature of the specific problem and the context in which it arises. Both quarreling and seeking peace can have their places, but certain situations call for different approaches.
Quarrel: Quarreling, or engaging in conflict, may be necessary in situations where there are fundamental disagreements, injustices, or when one party is being exploited or oppressed. Sometimes, speaking up and confronting issues directly can lead to resolution and positive change. However, it's important to remember that quarreling should aim to address the problem constructively, not exacerbate it further. In some cases, open communication about grievances can lead to finding common ground and working towards a resolution.
Peace: In many situations, pursuing peace and non-violent conflict resolution can be the preferable approach. Peaceful negotiations, compromise, and mediation can help to foster understanding, empathy, and cooperation among parties involved in a dispute. This approach is especially important for complex and sensitive issues where a win-win outcome is possible, and where long-term relationships need to be preserved.
In summary, there is no one-size-fits-all answer to whether quarreling or seeking peace is the better solution for all problems. It's essential to assess each situation individually and consider factors such as the severity of the issue, the willingness of the parties to engage in dialogue, and the potential for finding mutually beneficial solutions. Ultimately, the goal should be to find the most constructive and sustainable way to resolve conflicts and promote harmony.