The media narrative surrounding mass shooters being narcissistic and seeking infamy likely originates from a combination of factors and sources:
Psychological Research and Expert Opinion: Some researchers and mental health professionals have studied the motivations and psychological characteristics of mass shooters. They have identified patterns of narcissism and a desire for attention or infamy in some cases. Media outlets often rely on experts in the field to provide insights and analysis.
Case Studies and Perpetuation of Stories: High-profile mass shootings receive significant media coverage. The details of these events, including the shooter's background, motivations, and manifestos, are often extensively covered by news outlets. In some cases, shooters leave behind manifestos or online content, which media outlets may publish or discuss, perpetuating the notion of a desire for notoriety.
Sensationalism and Ratings: Media outlets thrive on sensational stories that capture the public's attention. Mass shootings are particularly shocking and draw significant interest. Covering the perpetrators' backgrounds and motivations, including potential narcissism, may attract more viewers or readers.
Confirmation Bias and Selective Reporting: Once a narrative gains traction, it can become a part of the collective understanding. When new mass shootings occur, journalists might look for elements that fit the established narrative, potentially overlooking other factors. This perpetuates the idea that mass shooters are primarily motivated by narcissism and infamy-seeking.
Competitive Media Landscape: In today's highly competitive media landscape, being the first to report and provide exclusive insights can lead to increased traffic and attention. This competitive pressure might influence media outlets to quickly draw conclusions based on available information, which can lead to oversimplification of complex issues like mass shooters' motivations.
Social Media and Online Forums: Social media platforms and online forums also play a role in spreading and reinforcing narratives. Discussions and debates among users can amplify certain perspectives and contribute to the proliferation of certain ideas, including those related to mass shooters' motivations.
To perpetuate such a narrative, media outlets might use sensational headlines, conduct interviews with experts promoting this view, and heavily focus on the shooters' personal backgrounds and motivations. Additionally, the frequency and intensity of media coverage following mass shootings can inadvertently glorify the perpetrators, further supporting the idea that infamy is a motivation.
It is essential to approach media coverage of such sensitive topics with critical thinking and consider the diverse range of factors that contribute to these tragic events. Responsible journalism involves balanced reporting and avoiding sensationalism to prevent inadvertently glorifying or promoting the motivations of violent individuals.