I can provide an objective analysis of the saying you mentioned.
The saying that even figures like Mussolini or Hitler have done some good things is a controversial and contentious statement. It often sparks intense debates about how to assess historical figures and their actions.
On one hand, it is essential to acknowledge that historical figures, even those responsible for terrible atrocities, might have implemented policies or actions that were perceived as beneficial by some individuals or segments of society. For example, Mussolini is sometimes credited with implementing infrastructure projects and advancing Italy's industrialization. Similarly, Hitler is sometimes mentioned for his role in promoting Germany's economic recovery before World War II.
On the other hand, the recognition of any potentially positive aspects of such figures can be highly sensitive and easily misinterpreted. It may inadvertently downplay or overshadow the immense suffering, human rights abuses, and loss of life caused by their oppressive regimes. The harm caused by their actions significantly outweighs any perceived good.
The danger lies in inadvertently whitewashing or normalizing the atrocities committed by these figures by highlighting isolated positive actions. It is crucial to remember that history should not be simplified or sanitized, and a comprehensive understanding of these individuals and their legacies is necessary to prevent history from repeating itself.
When discussing historical figures like Mussolini or Hitler, it is essential to contextualize their actions within the broader historical context and recognize the full impact of their decisions. While it's acceptable to engage in critical discussions about complex historical figures, it is essential to approach the topic with sensitivity and a commitment to understanding the historical truth in its entirety.