Determining the impossibility of something without evidence for or against it can be challenging. In the absence of evidence, it is important to remain open-minded and avoid making absolute conclusions. Here are some ways people approach such situations:
Lack of evidence is not proof of impossibility: Just because there is no evidence supporting or refuting a claim doesn't automatically make it impossible. It simply means that there is insufficient information at the moment to draw a definitive conclusion.
Occam's Razor: This principle suggests that when faced with multiple explanations for a phenomenon, the simplest one that requires the fewest assumptions is more likely to be true. In situations with no evidence, simpler explanations may be more reasonable until further evidence emerges.
Avoiding absolute statements: Instead of declaring something as impossible, it's more accurate to say that there is no evidence currently supporting or refuting it. Being open to new evidence or information is crucial.
Scientific inquiry: Science is built on the principle of investigating and understanding the natural world through empirical evidence and observation. If a claim can be tested through the scientific method, it may help establish its validity.
Probability and plausibility: Evaluate the likelihood of a claim being true based on existing knowledge and evidence. Claims that contradict well-established scientific principles or are highly implausible may be regarded with skepticism.
Humility and open-mindedness: Acknowledge the limits of current knowledge and be open to revising beliefs when new evidence emerges.
In summary, it is essential to maintain a balanced and rational approach when faced with claims for which there is no evidence either for or against. Avoid making absolute statements about impossibility and remain open to the possibility of new evidence altering our understanding of the world.